Compare Lenovo Phab vs Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on Lenovo Phab is 28.0% more
  • Both Lenovo Phab and Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Lenovo Phab is the same as Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465
 
Lenovo Phab
Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
89 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
69 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6.98 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
210.4 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Spreadtrum SC9832   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Flash Autofocus, Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Vibe UI Indus OS 2.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
186 x 97 x 8.9 143.5 x 71.6 x 8.65   
Weight
250 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Tuxedo Black Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
23.91GB 10.79GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4250mAh 3900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Lenovo Phab vs Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 Specs

Specs
Lenovo PhabMicromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465  
Screen Size 6.98 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 4250mAh3900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display at a decent 294PPI
  • Good build quality and design
  • 5 inch form factor makes it comfortable to hold and use single handedly
  • Inclusion of 12 local languages is a huge plus for Indian users
  • Decent battery life with average usage
The Bad
  • Not the best performance in the price range
  • Slow charging might frustrate some
  • Fingerprint sensor is not that great

Lenovo Phab Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Huge display gives a great multimedia experience
  • Great battery life with 4250mAh unit
  • 4G LTE enabled
  • Expandable storage up to 64GB
The Bad
  • Below average display quality with just 210PPI
  • Mediocre performance with a chipset for budget devices
  • Not that great camera output
  • Huge size for comfortable usage as a mobile device

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Phab with Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465. When you see Lenovo Phab Vs Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Phab stands against Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 is Rs. 8,771. The prices for both these products were updated October 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page