Compare Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus 3GB vs Panasonic P88

Feature Comparison

  • The Panasonic P88's Screen Size measures in at 5.3 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 5.0% more
  • Both Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus 3GB and Panasonic P88 have same Internal Storage
  • The 3GB RAM on the Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus 3GB is 33.0% more
 
We Love
Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus 3GB
Panasonic P88
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
91 Value For Money Score
63 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.3 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD -   
Pixel Density
441 PPI 277 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm -   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 -   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama rear camera with triple LED Flash, front-facing camera with LED flash   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
VibeUI -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
142 x 71 x 8 -   
Weight
142 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Dark Gray, Gold, Silver Gold, Charcoal Grey   
Build Material
Metal, Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.92GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2750mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus 3GB vs Panasonic P88 Specs

Specs
Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus 3GBPanasonic P88  
Screen Size 5 inch5.3 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2750mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus 3GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality with a compact design that is great for one handed usage
  • Thanks to Dolby Atmos powered dual speakers at the back, the audio output is good from the phone
  • The phone supports ANT VR headset that Lenovo sells separately
  • Sharp display with vibrant colour output
The Bad
  • The capacitive buttons below the display are not backlit
  • The chrome ring running around the phone picks up scratches easily
  • Battery really struggles to make past a whole day on moderate usage
  • There is no mention of any sort of protection on the display

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus 3GB with Panasonic P88. When you see Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus 3GB Vs Panasonic P88 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus 3GB stands against Panasonic P88 and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus 3GB is currently Rs. 7,499. The lowest price for Panasonic P88 is Rs. 7,000. The prices for both these products were updated October 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page