Compare Lenovo Vibe P1m vs Samsung Galaxy J2 (2016)

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Lenovo Vibe P1m is the same as Samsung Galaxy J2 (2016)
  • Lenovo Vibe P1m's 16GB Internal Storage is more than Samsung Galaxy J2 (2016)'s 8GB Internal Storage
  • Lenovo Vibe P1m has 2GB RAM and Samsung Galaxy J2 (2016) has 1.5GB RAM
 
Lenovo Vibe P1m
Samsung Galaxy J2 (2016)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
98 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
74 Value For Money Score
80 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735P Spreadtrum SC8830   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
141 x 71.8 x 9.3 142.4 x 71.1 x 8   
Weight
148 grams 170 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Gold, Silver, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB 3.9GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3900mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Lenovo Vibe P1m vs Samsung Galaxy J2 (2016) Specs

Specs
Lenovo Vibe P1mSamsung Galaxy J2 (2016)  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 3900mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy J2 (2016) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Metal sides and sturdy build quality
  • Multi-coloured notification LED ring circling the rear camera is good to have
  • Sharp and vibrant AMOLED display
  • Decent battery life for non-gamers
  • Runs on the latest Android 6.0 Marshmallow out of the box
The Bad
  • Only 1.5GB of RAM might be constraining
  • Below average camera performance
  • Samsung bloatware pre-installed
  • No Gyroscope and Ambient Light sensor

Lenovo Vibe P1m Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Huge 3900mAh battery helps it work longer
  • 16GB of Internal storage
  • Dual SIM 4G LTE Connectivity
The Bad
  • Only records in 720p
  • Lags under heavy multitasking

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Vibe P1m with Samsung Galaxy J2 (2016). When you see Lenovo Vibe P1m Vs Samsung Galaxy J2 (2016) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Vibe P1m stands against Samsung Galaxy J2 (2016) and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo Vibe P1m is currently Rs. 17,000. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J2 (2016) is Rs. 7,500. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page