Compare Lenovo Vibe Shot vs Yu Yunicorn

Feature Comparison

  • Yu Yunicorn has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Lenovo Vibe Shot has 5 inch Screen Size
  • Both Lenovo Vibe Shot and Yu Yunicorn have same Internal Storage
  • Yu Yunicorn's got 25.0% more RAM
 
Lenovo Vibe Shot
Yu Yunicorn
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
99 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
82 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Infrared Autofocus Feature and Tricolor Flash, OIS, Pro-shooting Mode, 16:9 BSI Sensor -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- YU OS   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
142.0 x 70 x 7.3 153.3 x 75.4 x 8.1   
Weight
145 grams 172 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Carmine Red, Graphite Gray, White Rush Gold, Silver Rush   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year Product Warranty & 6 months for accessories   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
25GB 25GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2900mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Lenovo Vibe Shot vs Yu Yunicorn Specs

Specs
Lenovo Vibe ShotYu Yunicorn  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP13MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2900mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Lenovo Vibe Shot Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good front and rear camera performance
  • Excellent build quality and design
  • Clean and smooth User Interface
The Bad
  • Heats up a little when performing graphic intensive tasks
  • Tons of pre-installed bloatware apps

Yu Yunicorn Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality with a nice premium-ness about it
  • Fantastic battery life
  • Fingerprint scanner is fast and accurate
  • Colours are sharp and pack a punch
The Bad
  • The phone feels a bit bulky and heavy
  • Missing an FM Radio
  • Camera shutter speed can be slow, overall camera performance is very average
  • Few duplicate apps are included

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Vibe Shot with Yu Yunicorn. When you see Lenovo Vibe Shot Vs Yu Yunicorn comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Vibe Shot stands against Yu Yunicorn and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo Vibe Shot is currently Rs. 9,900. The lowest price for Yu Yunicorn is Rs. 8,900. The prices for both these products were updated October 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page