Compare Lenovo Vibe X2 vs Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 4G

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo Vibe X2's 5 inch Screen Size is more than Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 4G's 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • The Lenovo Vibe X2's got 32GB Internal Storage, while Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 4G's Internal Storage is 8GB
  • Lenovo Vibe X2's RAM is 50.0% more
 
Lenovo Vibe X2
Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
62 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
82 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 245 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6595 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 0.3MP   
Camera Details
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Geo-Tagging, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.1   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
140.2 x 68.6 x 7.2 129.9 x 66.8 x 12.3   
Weight
120 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White, Gold Black   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 4.98GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2390mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Lenovo Vibe X2 vs Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 4G Specs

Specs
Lenovo Vibe X2Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 4G  
Screen Size 5 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2390mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP0.3MP  

Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The display is sharp with accurate colours even with resolution not being the highest
  • The design makes the phone comfortable to use with one hand
  • Largely stock Android
  • LTE connectivity is available
The Bad
  • Poor display legibility in direct sunlight
  • Performance generally feels laggy and stuttery
  • Camera really struggles even in well lit conditions

Lenovo Vibe X2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Stunning design with excellent build quality
  • Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Decent performance with 2GB of RAM
The Bad
  • Not that great battery life
  • Average rear camera performance
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Vibe X2 with Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 4G. When you see Lenovo Vibe X2 Vs Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Vibe X2 stands against Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo Vibe X2 is currently Rs. 7,999. The lowest price for Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) 4G is Rs. 6,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page