Compare Lenovo Zuk Z1 vs Xolo Era 4G

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo Zuk Z1's 5.5 inch Screen Size is more than Xolo Era 4G's 5 inch Screen Size
  • The Lenovo Zuk Z1's got 64GB Internal Storage, while Xolo Era 4G's Internal Storage is 8GB
  • The Lenovo Zuk Z1's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 66.0% more
 
Lenovo Zuk Z1
Xolo Era 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
41 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
91 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
2.5GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 Spreadtrum SC9830   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, Dual LED Flash Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Cyanogen OS 12.1 -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
USB Type C Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
155.7 x 77.3 x 8.9 145.5 x 72 x 8.45   
Weight
175 grams 142 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray Black   
Build Material
Glass, Metal -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
64GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
56GB 4.52GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4100mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
Yes -   

Lenovo Zuk Z1 vs Xolo Era 4G Specs

Specs
Lenovo Zuk Z1Xolo Era 4G  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  
RAM 3GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 4100mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP2MP  

Lenovo Zuk Z1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Fast and snappy fingerprint sensor
  • Excellent rear camera quality with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)
  • Good battery backup with the supplied 4100mAh battery with USB Type-C port and fast charging support
  • Ample 64GB of internal storage
The Bad
  • Outdated Android Lollipop (5.1) with delayed Android Marshmallow update
  • Lacks IR Blaster to control your gadgets like AC, TV, etc.
  • Reported network related issues with the phone

Xolo Era 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Corning Gorilla Glass protection
  • Decent battery backup
  • 4G support with VoLTE capability
  • Expandable storage up to 32GB via a MicroSD card
The Bad
  • Below average camera quality
  • Only 8GB of internal storage
  • Average performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Zuk Z1 with Xolo Era 4G. When you see Lenovo Zuk Z1 Vs Xolo Era 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Zuk Z1 stands against Xolo Era 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo Zuk Z1 is currently Rs. 9,700. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page