Compare LG G Flex 2 vs Lenovo Vibe P1m

Feature Comparison

  • LG G Flex 2's 5.5 inch Screen Size is more than Lenovo Vibe P1m's 5 inch Screen Size
  • Both LG G Flex 2 and Lenovo Vibe P1m have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of LG G Flex 2 is the same as Lenovo Vibe P1m
 
LG G Flex 2
Lenovo Vibe P1m
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
61 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
80 Value For Money Score
63 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MediaTek MT6735P   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 430 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
2.1MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Gesture Shot, Gesture View, and Soft Light, Dual LED Flash -   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.1 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 141 x 71.8 x 9.3   
Weight
152 grams 148 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Red Black, White   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 3900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

LG G Flex 2 vs Lenovo Vibe P1m Specs

Specs
LG G Flex 2Lenovo Vibe P1m  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh3900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2.1MP5MP  

LG G Flex 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Brilliant AMOLED display and sharp enough at 401PPI
  • Unique flexible display
  • Thanks to the curved display the phone sits well in the hands
  • Self healing back
  • Excellent performance with the Snapdragon 810 chipset
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Complains of heating issues when doing any memory intensive tasks
  • Images from the rear camera often look muted
  • Disappointing battery life when compared to its predecessor

Lenovo Vibe P1m Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Huge 3900mAh battery helps it work longer
  • 16GB of Internal storage
  • Dual SIM 4G LTE Connectivity
The Bad
  • Only records in 720p
  • Lags under heavy multitasking

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LG G Flex 2 with Lenovo Vibe P1m. When you see LG G Flex 2 Vs Lenovo Vibe P1m comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG G Flex 2 stands against Lenovo Vibe P1m and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Lenovo Vibe P1m is Rs. 14,116. The prices for both these products were updated November 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page