Compare LG G2 vs Motorola Moto Turbo

Feature Comparison

  • Both LG G2 and Motorola Moto Turbo have same Screen Size
  • Motorola Moto Turbo has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of Motorola Moto Turbo's is 33.0% more than LG G2
 
LG G2
Motorola Moto Turbo
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
71 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
79 Value For Money Score
83 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
423.6 PPI 565 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.26GHz 2.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 Qualcomm Snapdragon 805   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Adreno 420   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 21MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, Optical Image Stabilization, HDR Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
138.5 x 70.9 x 8.9 143.5 x 73.3 x 8.3   
Weight
143 grams 176 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Black   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 53.26GB   
Card Slot
No No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 3900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- Yes   
Fast Charging
- -   

LG G2 vs Motorola Moto Turbo Specs

Specs
LG G2Motorola Moto Turbo  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP21MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh3900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP2MP  

Motorola Moto Turbo Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Quad HD AMOLED Screen with Moto Display feature for quick access to notifications
  • Huge 3900mAh battery
  • Ample 64GB of internal storage
  • Fast charging out of the box
  • Hands-free voice control
The Bad
  • Middling camera quality
  • No fingerprint scanner
  • No TD-LTE (Band 40, 2300MHz) that some Indian 4G networks use

LG G2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent display
  • Double tap to power on and off the screen are really handy
  • Very reliable camera even in dim lights
  • Exceptional battery life
  • Thin bezels make the experience of using the phone nice
The Bad
  • The power and volume buttons at the back take some time getting used to
  • Plastic build makes the phone feel a little cheap
  • Lacks Micro SD card
  • Comes with bloatware on board
  • The plastic back picks up scratches rather easily

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LG G2 with Motorola Moto Turbo. When you see LG G2 Vs Motorola Moto Turbo comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG G2 stands against Motorola Moto Turbo and which one you should buy. The best price of LG G2 is currently Rs. 24,999. The lowest price for Motorola Moto Turbo is Rs. 31,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page