Compare LG G3 vs LeEco Le 1s Eco

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of LG G3 is the same as LeEco Le 1s Eco
  • LeEco Le 1s Eco has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • The LeEco Le 1s Eco's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 33.0% more
 
LG G3
LeEco Le 1s Eco
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
99 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
82 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
2560 x 1440 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
534 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.5GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MediaTek MT6795T Helio X10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2.1MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) , Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Digital image stabilization, Face detection, Touch to focus,   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, Laser Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
LG UI EUI 5.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
146.3 x 74.6 x 8.9 151.1 x 74.2 x 7.5   
Weight
149 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Titan, White Gold, Silver   
Build Material
- Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 24.4GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
Yes -   
Fast Charging
- -   

LG G3 vs LeEco Le 1s Eco Specs

Specs
LG G3LeEco Le 1s Eco  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2.1MP5MP  

LG G3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Beautiful display with excellent contrasts
  • UI has received a facelift as compared to predecessor and looks a lot better
  • Overall the performance is very smooth
  • Camera performance in broad daylight is exceptional
  • User removable battery
The Bad
  • Plastic build feels a little cheap
  • The volume and power buttons on the rear can take some time to get used to
  • Battery life takes a hit due to Quad HD display
  • The camera app can feel a bit too simplified

LeEco Le 1s Eco Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy finish and premium metallic build
  • Vibrant 1080p Display
  • Smooth Performance
  • InfraRed Universal Remote Control Function
  • Fingerprint Sensor
The Bad
  • Average camera performance
  • Confusing User Interface

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LG G3 with LeEco Le 1s Eco. When you see LG G3 Vs LeEco Le 1s Eco comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG G3 stands against LeEco Le 1s Eco and which one you should buy. The best price of LG G3 is currently Rs. 22,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 16, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page