Compare LG G3 32GB D855 vs Samsung Galaxy J Max

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy J Max's Screen Size is 21.0% more
  • LG G3 32GB D855's 32GB Internal Storage is more than Samsung Galaxy J Max's 8GB Internal Storage
  • The LG G3 32GB D855's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 50.0% more
 
LG G3 32GB D855
Samsung Galaxy J Max
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
53 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
84 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 7 inch   
Screen Resolution
2560 x 1440 pixels 1280 x 800 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
534 PPI 216 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
2.5GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 Spreadtrum SC8830   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2.1MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Phase Detection/Laser Autofocus, Optical Image Stabilization, Dual-LED (Dual Tone) Flash Digital Zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch focus, Face Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, Laser Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
LG UI TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
146.3 x 74.6 x 8.9 186.9 x 108.8 x 8.7   
Weight
149 grams 289 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Gold Black, Gold   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 3.9GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 200GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
Yes No   
Fast Charging
- No   

LG G3 32GB D855 vs Samsung Galaxy J Max Specs

Specs
LG G3 32GB D855Samsung Galaxy J Max  
Screen Size 5.5 inch7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 3GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2.1MP2MP  

LG G3 32GB D855 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Beautiful display with excellent contrasts
  • UI has received a facelift as compared to predecessor and looks a lot better
  • Overall the performance is very smooth
  • Camera performance in broad daylight is exceptional
  • User removable battery
The Bad
  • Plastic build feels a little cheap
  • The volume and power buttons on the rear can take some time to get used to
  • Battery life takes a hit due to Quad HD display
  • The camera app can feel a bit too simplified

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LG G3 32GB D855 with Samsung Galaxy J Max. When you see LG G3 32GB D855 Vs Samsung Galaxy J Max comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG G3 32GB D855 stands against Samsung Galaxy J Max and which one you should buy. The best price of LG G3 32GB D855 is currently Rs. 19,990. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J Max is Rs. 11,885. The prices for both these products were updated October 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page