Compare LG G3 Stylus (D690) vs Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)

Feature Comparison

  • The LG G3 Stylus (D690)'s Screen Size measures in at 5.5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 18.0% more
  • Internal Storage of LG G3 Stylus (D690) is the same as Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)
  • RAM of LG G3 Stylus (D690) is the same as Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)
 
LG G3 Stylus (D690)
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
57 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
58 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
200.3 PPI 245 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 Exynos 3475   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1.3MP 2MP   
Camera Details
BSI Sensor, Panorama Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
149.3 x 75.9 x 10.2 132.6 x 69.3 x 8.9   
Weight
163 grams 131 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black White, Gold, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
3.86GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

LG G3 Stylus (D690) vs Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) Specs

Specs
LG G3 Stylus (D690)Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.3MP2MP  

LG G3 Stylus (D690) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The phone has a solid design that is tried and tested on the LG G3
  • Comes with a stylus out of the box to help you draw or note on the screen
  • The phone comes with a removable back panel and a user replaceable battery
The Bad
  • Stylus does not have the most accurate tip and is not very good, in general
  • No apps specifically optimized for use of stylus, unlike the Note series which has plenty of them
  • Disappointing display overall

Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Comfortable size for one handed usage
  • 4G LTE connectivity is present
  • Dual SIM support and expansion available via MicroSD card instead of a hybrid SIM slot
The Bad
  • Back of the device is known to be flimsy and creeky
  • Speakers are a bit of a dissapointment

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LG G3 Stylus (D690) with Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016). When you see LG G3 Stylus (D690) Vs Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG G3 Stylus (D690) stands against Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) is Rs. 6,890. The prices for both these products were updated August 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page