Compare LG G4 Dual Sim vs Xolo Era 4G

Feature Comparison

  • LG G4 Dual Sim has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Xolo Era 4G has 5 inch Screen Size
  • LG G4 Dual Sim has 32GB Internal Storage and Xolo Era 4G has 8GB Internal Storage
  • The RAM on LG G4 Dual Sim is 66.0% more
 
LG G4 Dual Sim
Xolo Era 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
90 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
2560 x 1440 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
534 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 Spreadtrum SC9830   
Processor Type
Hexa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 418 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, Laser Autofocus, LED Flash Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
148.9 x 76.1 x 6.3 145.5 x 72 x 8.45   
Weight
155 grams 142 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Brown, Shiny Gold, Metallic Gray, Red, Black Black   
Build Material
Metal, Plastic, Leather -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
22.31GB 4.52GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
Yes -   
Fast Charging
- -   

LG G4 Dual Sim vs Xolo Era 4G Specs

Specs
LG G4 Dual SimXolo Era 4G  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP5MP  
RAM 3GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP2MP  

LG G4 Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent display with very well calibrated colors
  • User replaceable battery
  • Several options available when it comes to back panels
  • Laser Auto Focus is rapid, which allows for quick capturing of images
  • Capable of shooting images in RAW
The Bad
  • Below average battery life
  • No support for wireless charging out of the box
  • Design of the phone is bland and boring
  • Lack of fingerprint scanner is a shame

Xolo Era 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Corning Gorilla Glass protection
  • Decent battery backup
  • 4G support with VoLTE capability
  • Expandable storage up to 32GB via a MicroSD card
The Bad
  • Below average camera quality
  • Only 8GB of internal storage
  • Average performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LG G4 Dual Sim with Xolo Era 4G. When you see LG G4 Dual Sim Vs Xolo Era 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG G4 Dual Sim stands against Xolo Era 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of LG G4 Dual Sim is currently Rs. 19,990. The prices for both these products were updated August 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page