Compare LG Nexus 4 vs HTC Desire 626 LTE

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 626 LTE has 5 inch Screen Size and LG Nexus 4 has 4.7 inch Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of LG Nexus 4 is the same as HTC Desire 626 LTE
  • Both LG Nexus 4 and HTC Desire 626 LTE have same RAM
 
LG Nexus 4
HTC Desire 626 LTE
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
34 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
50 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 768 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
317.6 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 2 -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MediaTek MT6752   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 320 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Photo Sphere Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
- FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
133.9 x 68.7 x 9.1 146.9 x 70.9 x 8.2   
Weight
139 grams 140 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Blue Lagoon, White Birch   
Build Material
- Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.75GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
No -   

LG Nexus 4 vs HTC Desire 626 LTE Specs

Specs
LG Nexus 4HTC Desire 626 LTE  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

HTC Desire 626 LTE Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Well designed and built
  • Display is sharp enough at 294PPI
  • Excellent user interface
  • 4G LTE supported
The Bad
  • Mediocre performance due to the chipset
  • Outdated Android version (Android 4.4 KitKat)
  • Below average battery life
  • Lots of bloatware

LG Nexus 4 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent Vanilla Android Experience
  • Smaller form factor, good for one handed use
  • Sharp HD display with a pixel density of 318PPI
The Bad
  • Below average rear camera output
  • Non-expandable storage
  • Glass build on the back makes the phone slippery and prone to drops

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LG Nexus 4 with HTC Desire 626 LTE. When you see LG Nexus 4 Vs HTC Desire 626 LTE comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG Nexus 4 stands against HTC Desire 626 LTE and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 626 LTE is Rs. 9,290. The prices for both these products were updated November 19, 2017.
Report an error on this page