Compare LG X Cam vs Vivo Y55S

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of LG X Cam is the same as Vivo Y55S
  • Internal Storage of LG X Cam is the same as Vivo Y55S
  • Vivo Y55S's 3GB RAM is more than LG X Cam's 2GB RAM
 
LG X Cam
Vivo Y55S
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
91 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
77 Value For Money Score
71 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
424 PPI 282 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.14GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP3 Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
+5MP Rear Camera, Wide-Angle lens, Geo-tagging, Face Detection, Touch Focus f/2.0 Aperture, Auto Focus, Contious Focus, Digital Zoom, Geo tagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch Focus, Face Detection, White Balance, ISO Setting, Exposure Compensation, Self Timer, Scene Mode, Screen Flash   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
LG UI 5.0 Funtouch OS 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
147.50 x 73.60 x 6.90 147.9 x 72.9 x 7.5   
Weight
118 grams 142 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Titan Silver, Gold, Pink Gold Gold, Space Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 12GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
256GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2520mAh 2730mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

LG X Cam vs Vivo Y55S Specs

Specs
LG X CamVivo Y55S  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2520mAh2730mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

LG X Cam Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Handy form factor with slim design
  • Good dual rear camera outpot
  • Sharp and vivid display with 424PPI
  • Runs on the latest Android Marshmallow out of the box
The Bad
  • Mediocre performance, not for heavy tasks
  • Battery capacity is average, thanks to the Full HD display running
  • Plastic build quality makes it feel cheap
  • No fingerprint scanner is major drawback
  • Lacks 4K recording capability

Vivo Y55S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sleek & light weight design
  • Decent battery life
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
The Bad
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • Poor cameras
  • Average performance for the price

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare LG X Cam with Vivo Y55S. When you see LG X Cam Vs Vivo Y55S comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how LG X Cam stands against Vivo Y55S and which one you should buy. The best price of LG X Cam is currently Rs. 11,299. The lowest price for Vivo Y55S is Rs. 10,880. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page