Compare Meizu M3 Note vs Samsung Galaxy On Nxt

Feature Comparison

  • Both Meizu M3 Note and Samsung Galaxy On Nxt have same Screen Size
  • Both Meizu M3 Note and Samsung Galaxy On Nxt have same Internal Storage
  • Both Meizu M3 Note and Samsung Galaxy On Nxt have same RAM
 
Meizu M3 Note
Samsung Galaxy On Nxt
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
98 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
78 Value For Money Score
93 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10 Exynos 7870   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T860 MP2 Mali-T830   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama Beauty Face, Continuous Shot, HDR (High Dynamic Range), Interval Shot, Night, Panorama, Pro, Selfie, Sports, Sound and Shot, Wide Selfie   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
153.6 x 75.5 x 8.2 151.7 x 75 x 8   
Weight
163 grams 167 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Grey, Gold Black, Gold   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 24.5GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4100mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Meizu M3 Note vs Samsung Galaxy On Nxt Specs

Specs
Meizu M3 NoteSamsung Galaxy On Nxt  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 4100mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Meizu M3 Note Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good-looking metal construction
  • Good fingerprint sensor
  • Long battery life
The Bad
  • Not a class-leading performance
  • Average camera output

Samsung Galaxy On Nxt Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display at 401PPI with Gorilla Glass prortection
  • Good battery life that should last through a day for most
  • Solid metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Decent day-to-day performance
The Bad
  • Rear camera lacks 4K video recording
  • Performance of the rear camera in low light conditions could be better
  • Lacks fast charging support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Meizu M3 Note with Samsung Galaxy On Nxt. When you see Meizu M3 Note Vs Samsung Galaxy On Nxt comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Meizu M3 Note stands against Samsung Galaxy On Nxt and which one you should buy. The best price of Meizu M3 Note is currently Rs. 10,499. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy On Nxt is Rs. 15,749. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page