Compare Meizu M5 vs Micromax Vdeo 5 (Q4220)

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Vdeo 5 (Q4220)'s Screen Size is 5.0% more
  • Meizu M5's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • The Meizu M5 has 2GB RAM, which is 50.0% more
 
Meizu M5
Micromax Vdeo 5 (Q4220)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
59 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
90 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
282 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
2.5D Curved Glass -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6750 Spreadtrum SC9832   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-T860 MP2 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touchfocus, Face detection, White balance setting, ISO setting, Exposure compensation, self-timer, scene mode -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Flyme OS 5.5 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
147.28 × 72.8 × 8.15 -   
Weight
138 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Blue, Matte Black, Champagne Gold Black, Gold   
Build Material
Polycarbonate -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 38(2600), 40(2300 -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3070mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Meizu M5 vs Micromax Vdeo 5 (Q4220) Specs

Specs
Meizu M5Micromax Vdeo 5 (Q4220)  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 3070mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Meizu M5 with Micromax Vdeo 5 (Q4220). When you see Meizu M5 Vs Micromax Vdeo 5 (Q4220) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Meizu M5 stands against Micromax Vdeo 5 (Q4220) and which one you should buy. The best price of Meizu M5 is currently Rs. 7,599. The lowest price for Micromax Vdeo 5 (Q4220) is Rs. 6,749. The prices for both these products were updated November 19, 2017.
Report an error on this page