Compare Micromax A200 Canvas Turbo Mini vs Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB)

Feature Comparison

  • The Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB)'s got 5.2 inch Screen Size, while Micromax A200 Canvas Turbo Mini's Screen Size is 4.7 inch
  • Internal Storage of Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB)'s is 87.0% more than Micromax A200 Canvas Turbo Mini
  • The Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) has 4GB RAM, which is 75.0% more
 
Micromax A200 Canvas Turbo Mini
We Love
Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
25 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
91 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 2GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 4GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 12MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, auto-HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android O   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Water Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
- 150.2 x 74 x 7.7   
Weight
- 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Blue, White Lunar Gray, Fine Gold   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.6GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Turbo Charging   

Micromax A200 Canvas Turbo Mini vs Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) Specs

Specs
Micromax A200 Canvas Turbo MiniMotorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB)  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP12MP  
RAM 1GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy build quality
  • Good battery life with Turbo Charging
  • Decent camera on either sides
  • Dedicated Micro SD card slot
  • Excellent overall performance with near-stock Android Nougat
The Bad
  • Speaker output could have been better
  • Heats up slightly on extensive use of GPS
  • Bundled earphones are very basic

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax A200 Canvas Turbo Mini with Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB). When you see Micromax A200 Canvas Turbo Mini Vs Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax A200 Canvas Turbo Mini stands against Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax A200 Canvas Turbo Mini is currently Rs. 6,495. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G5 Plus (4GB/32GB) is Rs. 13,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page