Compare Micromax A240 Canvas Doodle 2 vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax A240 Canvas Doodle 2 has 5.7 inch Screen Size, whereas Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) has 5.5 inch Screen Size
  • Both Micromax A240 Canvas Doodle 2 and Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) have same Internal Storage
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s RAM is 66.0% more
 
Micromax A240 Canvas Doodle 2
We Love
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
37 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
57 Value For Money Score
95 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.7 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
257.6 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6589 Exynos 7580   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX544 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
12MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Image Stabilization, Face & Smile Detection, HDR Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
161 x 82.5 x 8.9 151.5 x 74.1 x 7.3   
Weight
220 grams 172 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Blue White, Black, Gold   
Build Material
- Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
13GB 10.82GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Fast Charging   

Micromax A240 Canvas Doodle 2 vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) Specs

Specs
Micromax A240 Canvas Doodle 2Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)  
Screen Size 5.7 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 12MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent build quality rivaling that of the Galaxy S6
  • Vibrant display with sharp colours
  • Solid battery life that easily lasts a whole day
  • Samsung bundles the phone with very little bloatware
The Bad
  • The UI overall can be sluggish with lags
  • Not a device meant for gaming as it tends to drop quite a lot of frames
  • Camera app takes a while to launch which leads to missing shots
  • Low light shots from the camera have a lot of noise

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax A240 Canvas Doodle 2 with Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016). When you see Micromax A240 Canvas Doodle 2 Vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax A240 Canvas Doodle 2 stands against Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax A240 Canvas Doodle 2 is currently Rs. 5,999. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) is Rs. 17,490. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page