Compare Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 vs Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB

Feature Comparison

  • The Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB's got 5.5 inch Screen Size, while Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114's Screen Size is 5 inch
  • Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB has 32GB Internal Storage and Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 has 4GB Internal Storage
  • The 3GB RAM on the Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB is 66.0% more
 
Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114
Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
63 Value For Money Score
91 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
220.3 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582M Qualcomm Snapdragon 617   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, Auto-HDR, Pro Mode, Slo-Mo   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Laser Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android O   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
145 x 73 x 9.7 153 x 76.6 x 9.8   
Weight
147 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black, White   
Build Material
- Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1GB 25GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Turbo Charging   

Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 vs Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Brilliant Full HD display at 401PPI
  • Quite good battery life with the 3000mAh unit packed inside with Turbo Charging
  • Quick and accurate fingerprint sensor
  • Excellent primary camera performance with Laser Autofocus
  • Latest Android Marshmallow out of the box with Android N update
The Bad
  • Heating issues while gaming
  • Not a perfect phone for GPS navigation as it lacks Compass sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 with Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB. When you see Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 Vs Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 stands against Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 is currently Rs. 5,799. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G4 Plus 32GB is Rs. 13,499. The prices for both these products were updated October 16, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page