Compare Micromax Canvas 6 Pro vs Coolpad Note 3S

Feature Comparison

  • Both Micromax Canvas 6 Pro and Coolpad Note 3S have same Screen Size
  • Coolpad Note 3S has 32GB Internal Storage, whereas Micromax Canvas 6 Pro has 16GB Internal Storage
  • Micromax Canvas 6 Pro has 25.0% more RAM
 
Micromax Canvas 6 Pro
Coolpad Note 3S
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
99 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
83 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1.36GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 415   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
4GB 3GB   
Graphics
- -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- CoolUI 8.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
- 154.5 x 77 x 8.6   
Weight
- 167 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Gold, White   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10.78GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- -   

Micromax Canvas 6 Pro vs Coolpad Note 3S Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas 6 ProCoolpad Note 3S  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 4GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Coolpad Note 3S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Proficient design & overall build
  • Near stock Android 6.0 Marshmallow
  • Satisfactory performance, ideal for day-to-day usage
The Bad
  • Non-competent display
  • Sub-optimal cameras
  • Substandard battery life

Micromax Canvas 6 Pro Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unlike most Micromax devices, a well built and a good looking smartphone
  • User removable back panel and replaceable battery
  • 4GB RAM ensures that the performance is virtually lag free
  • On-screen buttons are present
The Bad
  • A ton of pre-installed apps come with the device
  • Any serious gaming leads to the phone heating up
  • No fingerprint scanner
  • Less than adequate battery backup
  • Overall dissapointing camera performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas 6 Pro with Coolpad Note 3S. When you see Micromax Canvas 6 Pro Vs Coolpad Note 3S comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas 6 Pro stands against Coolpad Note 3S and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax Canvas 6 Pro is currently Rs. 8,990. The lowest price for Coolpad Note 3S is Rs. 8,499. The prices for both these products were updated August 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page