Compare Micromax Canvas 6 vs LG Q6

Feature Comparison

  • Both Micromax Canvas 6 and LG Q6 have same Screen Size
  • Both Micromax Canvas 6 and LG Q6 have same Internal Storage
  • Both Micromax Canvas 6 and LG Q6 have same RAM
 
Micromax Canvas 6
We Love
LG Q6
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
88 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 2160 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 439 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
LED Flash, PDAF, f/2.0 Aperture Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Optical zoom, Digital image stabilization, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Self timer, Scene mode, Touch focus, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 7.1 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio, Face Recognition   
Dimensions (mm)
- 142.5 x 69.3 x 8.1   
Weight
- 149 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Silver Astro Black, Ice Platinum, Terra Gold   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
25.72GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- -   

Micromax Canvas 6 vs LG Q6 Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas 6LG Q6  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Micromax Canvas 6 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The metal unibody construction gives the phone a premium feel
  • The fingerprint scanner is fast and responsive
  • The subtle curve on the back of the phone makes it sit really nicely in the palm
  • Near stock Android experience
The Bad
  • No Gorilla glass or reinforced glass for protection
  • The device ships with sizable bloatware
  • Camera performance is very average
  • Tends to get moderately hot when subjected to intense gaming

LG Q6 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The best looking budget smartphone
  • Smaller form factor
  • Good value for money
The Bad
  • Lacks fingerprint scanner
  • average performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas 6 with LG Q6. When you see Micromax Canvas 6 Vs LG Q6 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas 6 stands against LG Q6 and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax Canvas 6 is currently Rs. 8,149. The lowest price for LG Q6 is Rs. 12,990. The prices for both these products were updated September 25, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page