Compare Micromax Canvas Juice 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Micromax Canvas Juice 3 is the same as Xiaomi Redmi 3S
  • Xiaomi Redmi 3S has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both Micromax Canvas Juice 3 and Xiaomi Redmi 3S have same RAM
 
Micromax Canvas Juice 3
Xiaomi Redmi 3S
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
58 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
80 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6580 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama,   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Indus OS 2.0 MIUI 7   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
141 x 70 x 8.9 139.30 x 69.60 x 8.50   
Weight
150 grams 144 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Charcoal Grey Silver, Gray, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 9.76GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Micromax Canvas Juice 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas Juice 3Xiaomi Redmi 3S  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Xiaomi Redmi 3S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Very impressive battery life
  • Bright and sharp display with 294PPI
  • Handy form factor and good build quality
  • Rear and front cameras take good pictures compared to others
  • Latest Android Marshmallow based MIUI
The Bad
  • 2GB of RAM might max out, thanks to the heavily skinned UI from Xiaomi
  • Usability of either Dual SIMs or a Single SIM with a MicroSD card (Hybrid slot) can disappoint some

Micromax Canvas Juice 3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Great battery life with a 4000mAh unit
  • Crisp and vivid display with pixel density of 294PPI
The Bad
  • Lacks 4G LTE support
  • Runs an older Android 5.1 Lollipop with no news of update to Marshmallow
  • No Gorilla Glass protection

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas Juice 3 with Xiaomi Redmi 3S. When you see Micromax Canvas Juice 3 Vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas Juice 3 stands against Xiaomi Redmi 3S and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Xiaomi Redmi 3S is Rs. 7,490. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page