Compare Micromax Canvas Knight A350 vs Motorola Moto X Style

Feature Comparison

  • Motorola Moto X Style has 12.0% more Screen Size
  • The Micromax Canvas Knight A350 has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • Motorola Moto X Style's RAM is 33.0% more
 
Micromax Canvas Knight A350
Motorola Moto X Style
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
63 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
87 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 515.3 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592T Qualcomm Snapdragon 808   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Hexa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Adreno 418   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 21MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection 1/2.4'' Sensor Size, 1.1 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, Auto-HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Water Resistance, Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
145 x 72 x 9 153.9 x 76.2 x 6.1   
Weight
154 grams 179 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Black, White & Champagne   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal, Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
25GB 12.51GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2350mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Micromax Canvas Knight A350 vs Motorola Moto X Style Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas Knight A350Motorola Moto X Style  
Screen Size 5 inch5.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP21MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2350mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Motorola Moto X Style Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent build quality that feels solid in the hand
  • The curved back feels very ergonomic
  • Close to stock Android experience
  • Loud and clear speakers
  • Beautiful large display with sharp and deep colours
The Bad
  • Lack of fingerprint scanner
  • Battery life leaves a bit to be desired
  • Despite great improvements in the camera, it falls short of the mark set by the flagships
  • No wireless charging
  • Performance can be a little choppy when doing memory heavy tasks

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas Knight A350 with Motorola Moto X Style. When you see Micromax Canvas Knight A350 Vs Motorola Moto X Style comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas Knight A350 stands against Motorola Moto X Style and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax Canvas Knight A350 is currently Rs. 26,999. The lowest price for Motorola Moto X Style is Rs. 26,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page