Compare Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 vs Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM

Feature Comparison

  • The 5 inch Screen Size on the Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM is 5.0% more
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 is 50.0% more
  • Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 has 50.0% more RAM
 
Micromax Canvas Selfie A255
Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
85 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
71 Value For Money Score
56 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 Qualcomm Snapdragon 200   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Adreno 302   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Geo-Tagging   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 480p Video Recording   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Windows Phone   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Windows Phone 8.1   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
146.3 x 67.3 x 9.65 144 x 73.7 x 9.4   
Weight
138 grams 152 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Angelic White, Mystic Blue Cyan, Orange, White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.14GB 3.39GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 vs Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM Specs

Specs
Micromax Canvas Selfie A255Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  

Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front facing flash for low light selfie and selfie lovers
  • Crisp display at 312PPI with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
The Bad
  • Quite old Android version (4.4 KitKat)
  • Mediocre performance

Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Attractive design
  • Available in bright shiny colours, making the phone standout in the segment
  • Color reproduction on screen is good
  • User removable and replaceable back panel
The Bad
  • Substantial shutter lag makes the camera really difficult to use
  • Lacks HD Video recording on the rear camera
  • Overall the performance is not very snappy
  • Camera app takes a long time to load, which leads to you missing out on shots

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 with Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM. When you see Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 Vs Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 stands against Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 is currently Rs. 6,099. The prices for both these products were updated October 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page