Compare Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 vs LYF Wind 7s

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 is the same as LYF Wind 7s
  • Internal Storage of Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 is the same as LYF Wind 7s
  • Both Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 and LYF Wind 7s have same RAM
 
Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465
LYF Wind 7s
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
79 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.72 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC9832 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Adreno 304   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- White balancing, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Self timer, Scene mode, Face detection, Touch focus, Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Panorama, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Indus OS 2.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
143.5 x 71.6 x 8.65 143.5 x 72 x 8.7   
Weight
145 grams 156 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold Black, Blue   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10.79GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3900mAh 2250mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 vs LYF Wind 7s Specs

Specs
Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465LYF Wind 7s  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3900mAh2250mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display at a decent 294PPI
  • Good build quality and design
  • 5 inch form factor makes it comfortable to hold and use single handedly
  • Inclusion of 12 local languages is a huge plus for Indian users
  • Decent battery life with average usage
The Bad
  • Not the best performance in the price range
  • Slow charging might frustrate some
  • Fingerprint sensor is not that great

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 with LYF Wind 7s. When you see Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 Vs LYF Wind 7s comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 stands against LYF Wind 7s and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 is currently Rs. 8,771. The lowest price for LYF Wind 7s is Rs. 5,952. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page