Compare Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 vs Motorola Moto C Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Both Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 and Motorola Moto C Plus have same Screen Size
  • Both Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 and Motorola Moto C Plus have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 is the same as Motorola Moto C Plus
 
Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465
Motorola Moto C Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.72 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC9832 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Camera Details
- 1.4 µm pixel size, geo-tagging, touch focus, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
Indus OS 2.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
143.5 x 71.6 x 8.65 144 x 72.3 x 10   
Weight
145 grams 151 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold Fine Gold, Starry Black, Pearl White   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10.79GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3900mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 vs Motorola Moto C Plus Specs

Specs
Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465Motorola Moto C Plus  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3900mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display at a decent 294PPI
  • Good build quality and design
  • 5 inch form factor makes it comfortable to hold and use single handedly
  • Inclusion of 12 local languages is a huge plus for Indian users
  • Decent battery life with average usage
The Bad
  • Not the best performance in the price range
  • Slow charging might frustrate some
  • Fingerprint sensor is not that great

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 with Motorola Moto C Plus. When you see Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 Vs Motorola Moto C Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 stands against Motorola Moto C Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 is currently Rs. 6,962. The lowest price for Motorola Moto C Plus is Rs. 6,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page