Compare Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM vs Intex Aqua S7

Feature Comparison

  • Both Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM and Intex Aqua S7 have same Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on Intex Aqua S7 is 50.0% more
  • Intex Aqua S7 has 66.0% more RAM
 
Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM
Intex Aqua S7
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
43 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail X Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 302 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging PIP mode, panorama mode, slow motion video,gesture shot, smile detection   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
Windows Phone 8.1 Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
144 x 73.7 x 9.4 142.50 x 72.50 x 8.70   
Weight
152 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Cyan, Orange, White, Black Champagne, Dark Blue, Rose Gold   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
3.39GB 10GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 64GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2200mAh 3200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM vs Intex Aqua S7 Specs

Specs
Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIMIntex Aqua S7  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2200mAh3200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Intex Aqua S7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp and vivid display
  • Good build quality and design
  • Battery life is quite good
  • Ships with Android 6.0 Marshmallow out of the box
The Bad
  • Average overall performance from the device
  • Tons of bloatware pre-installed
  • Output from either of the cameras is not great

Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Attractive design
  • Available in bright shiny colours, making the phone standout in the segment
  • Color reproduction on screen is good
  • User removable and replaceable back panel
The Bad
  • Substantial shutter lag makes the camera really difficult to use
  • Lacks HD Video recording on the rear camera
  • Overall the performance is not very snappy
  • Camera app takes a long time to load, which leads to you missing out on shots

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM with Intex Aqua S7. When you see Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM Vs Intex Aqua S7 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM stands against Intex Aqua S7 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Intex Aqua S7 is Rs. 8,899. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page