Compare Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (2GB/32GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (2GB/32GB)'s Screen Size is 9.0% more
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (2GB/32GB)'s got 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (2GB/32GB) has 2GB RAM and Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim has 1GB RAM
 
Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim
We Love
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (2GB/32GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
28 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
88 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
0.9MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Backside-illuminated Image Sensor, Dynamic Flash, Rich Capture Geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection, HDR, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8.1 MIUI 8   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
141.3 x 72.2 x 8.8 151 x 76 x 8.4   
Weight
145 grams 165 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Black, Gold, Dark Gray   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- -   

Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (2GB/32GB) Specs

Specs
Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual SimXiaomi Redmi Note 4 (2GB/32GB)  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.9MP5MP  

Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (2GB/32GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Magnificent battery performance
  • Decent cameras on either sides
  • Build quality feels solid
  • Soon to receive Android Nougat
The Bad
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Bloated MIUI 8
  • 2GB RAM might cause some performance issues at times

Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Decent display + Gorilla Glass 3 Protection
  • Dual SIM Support
The Bad
  • Average camera performance
  • Laggy Performance
  • Windows App Store lacks apps

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim with Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (2GB/32GB). When you see Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim Vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (2GB/32GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Microsoft Lumia 640 Dual Sim stands against Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (2GB/32GB) and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page