Compare Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM vs Oppo R7 Lite

Feature Comparison

  • Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM's Screen Size is 12.0% more
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the Oppo R7 Lite is 50.0% more
  • Oppo R7 Lite has 2GB RAM, whereas Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM has 1GB RAM
 
Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM
Oppo R7 Lite
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
71 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
72 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
257.6 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Backside-illuminated Image Sensor, Rich Capture -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8.1 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
157.9 x 81.5 x 9 143 x 71 x 6.3   
Weight
171 grams 147 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Orange, Matte Cyan, Black, Glossy White Gold, Silver   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2320mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM vs Oppo R7 Lite Specs

Specs
Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIMOppo R7 Lite  
Screen Size 5.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2320mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Oppo R7 Lite Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solidly built with no creeks and loose components
  • Metallic body gives the phone a premium feel
  • Excellent battery life
  • Feature full and interesting camera app with lots of customization possible
The Bad
  • No Full HD display
  • The camera really struggles in low light shots
  • Surprisingly there is no NFC or FM Radio
  • Sound output, both from headphones and speakers is below satisfactory

Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Great battery life
  • Both cameras perform well
The Bad
  • Huge size makes it tough to hold
  • Poor pixel density robs the viewing experience
  • Windows App Store has very few apps
  • 8GB of internal storage may feel less

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM with Oppo R7 Lite. When you see Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM Vs Oppo R7 Lite comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM stands against Oppo R7 Lite and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Oppo R7 Lite is Rs. 11,000. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page