Compare Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM vs HTC One E9+

Feature Comparison

  • Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM's Screen Size is 3.0% more
  • Internal Storage of HTC One E9+'s is 75.0% more than Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM
  • The 3GB RAM on the HTC One E9+ is 66.0% more
 
Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM
HTC One E9+
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
53 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
95 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.7 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
257.6 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 20MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 4MP   
Camera Details
Backside-illuminated Image Sensor Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-Tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8.1 Sense UI   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
157.9 x 81.5 x 9 156.5 x 76.5 x 7.54   
Weight
171 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Orange Meteor Grey, Rose Gold   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
3GB 22GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3120mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM vs HTC One E9+ Specs

Specs
Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIMHTC One E9+  
Screen Size 5.7 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP20MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3120mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP4MP  

HTC One E9+ Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Mindboggling display quality at 534PPI with Gorilla Glass 4 protection
  • HTC BoomSound Stereo speakers
  • Metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Decent performance and battery life
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • No fast charging support

Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Great battery life
  • Both cameras perform well
  • 4G LTE Connectivity
The Bad
  • Huge size makes it tough to hold
  • Poor pixel density robs the viewing experience
  • Windows App Store has very few apps
  • 8GB of internal storage may feel less

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM with HTC One E9+. When you see Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM Vs HTC One E9+ comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM stands against HTC One E9+ and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page