Compare Microsoft Lumia 650 Dual SIM vs Motorola Moto G4

Feature Comparison

  • Motorola Moto G4 has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Microsoft Lumia 650 Dual SIM is the same as Motorola Moto G4
  • The Motorola Moto G4's got 2GB RAM, while Microsoft Lumia 650 Dual SIM's RAM is 1GB
 
Microsoft Lumia 650 Dual SIM
We Love
Motorola Moto G4
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
58 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
62 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
297 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 304 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Panorama, Auto-HDR, Pro Mode, Slo-Mo   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
Windows 10 Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
142 x 70.90 x 6.90 153 x 76.6 x 9.8   
Weight
122 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Matte White, Matte Black White, Black   
Build Material
Metal, Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.72GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
200GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Turbo Charging   

Microsoft Lumia 650 Dual SIM vs Motorola Moto G4 Specs

Specs
Microsoft Lumia 650 Dual SIMMotorola Moto G4  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Microsoft Lumia 650 Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good design and build quality
  • Decent camera output
  • Crisp and vibrant display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
The Bad
  • Lacks compass sensor
  • Average battery life
  • Lacks Full HD video recording capability

Motorola Moto G4 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Brilliant Full HD display at 401PPI
  • Quite decent battery life by the 3000mAh unit packed inside with Turbo Charging
  • Latest Android Marshmallow out of the box with Android N update
  • Impressive primary camera performance
The Bad
  • Heating issues while gaming
  • Not a perfect phone for GPS navigation as it lacks Compass sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Microsoft Lumia 650 Dual SIM with Motorola Moto G4. When you see Microsoft Lumia 650 Dual SIM Vs Motorola Moto G4 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Microsoft Lumia 650 Dual SIM stands against Motorola Moto G4 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G4 is Rs. 8,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page