Compare Motorola Nexus 6 64GB vs Sony Xperia X Performance

Feature Comparison

  • The 6 inch Screen Size on the Motorola Nexus 6 64GB is 16.0% more
  • Motorola Nexus 6 64GB has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both Motorola Nexus 6 64GB and Sony Xperia X Performance have same RAM
 
Motorola Nexus 6 64GB
Sony Xperia X Performance
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
94 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
80 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
2560 x 1440 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
494 PPI 441 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.7GHz 2.15GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 420 Adreno 530   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 23MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 13MP   
Camera Details
1.4 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR, Optical Stabilization 1/2.3" Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 7.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
159.26 x 82.98 x 10 143.7 x 70.4 x 8.7   
Weight
189 grams 164 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Cloud White, Midnight Blue Black, Rose Gold, White   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
64GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 200GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3220mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Motorola Nexus 6 64GB vs Sony Xperia X Performance Specs

Specs
Motorola Nexus 6 64GBSony Xperia X Performance  
Screen Size 6 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP23MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3220mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP13MP  

Motorola Nexus 6 64GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Stunning Quad HD AMOLED display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Excellent performance with Snapdragon 805 with 3GB RAM
  • Seamless and first to have Android updates
  • Water resistant
  • Dual firing stereo speakers gives good multimedia experience
The Bad
  • Huge siezed form factor of the device makes it uncomfortable to hold it after a while
  • No expandable storage
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • Tends to heat a little with continues usage

Sony Xperia X Performance Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Powerful Processor
  • Good camera performance
The Bad
  • No 4K video recording available

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Nexus 6 64GB with Sony Xperia X Performance. When you see Motorola Nexus 6 64GB Vs Sony Xperia X Performance comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Nexus 6 64GB stands against Sony Xperia X Performance and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page