Compare Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen vs Coolpad Note 3

Feature Comparison

  • Coolpad Note 3's Screen Size is 9.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen is the same as Coolpad Note 3
  • Coolpad Note 3 has 33.0% more RAM
 
Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen
Coolpad Note 3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
91 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
74 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
141.5 x 70.7 x 11 151.00 x 77.00 x 9.30   
Weight
149 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White White, Black   
Build Material
Polycarbonate Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.81MB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2470mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen vs Coolpad Note 3 Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto G 3rd GenCoolpad Note 3  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2470mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Coolpad Note 3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Fingerprint sensor with Individual app lock support
  • Ample 3GB of RAM for good multitasking experience
  • Dual SIM 4G support
  • Decent battery life
The Bad
  • Heats up while performing graphic intensive tasks
  • Some bloatwares pre-installed
  • Average display sharpness at just 267PPI

Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good HD display and Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Near Stock UI experience and faster Android updates
  • Water Resistant IP67 rating
  • 4G and VoLTE Support
  • Improved 13MP camera
The Bad
  • Average battery capacity at 2470mAh
  • No Full HD display
  • No notification LED
  • No USB cable supplied with the device

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen with Coolpad Note 3. When you see Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen Vs Coolpad Note 3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen stands against Coolpad Note 3 and which one you should buy. The best price of Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen is currently Rs. 10,999. The lowest price for Coolpad Note 3 is Rs. 9,149. The prices for both these products were updated May 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page