Compare Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB vs Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM

Feature Comparison

  • Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM has 21.0% more Screen Size
  • Both Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB and Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM have same Internal Storage
  • Both Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB and Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM have same RAM
 
Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB
Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
80 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
63 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
326 PPI 257.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama Backside-illuminated Image Sensor, Rich Capture   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Windows Phone   
OS Version
Android 4.3 Jelly Bean -   
OS Detail
- Windows Phone 8.1   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.1 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
129.9 x 65.9 x 11.6 157.9 x 81.5 x 9   
Weight
143 grams 171 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Orange, Matte Cyan, Black, Glossy White   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2070mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB vs Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GBMicrosoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2070mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Near stock Android experience with promise for quick updates in future
  • Compact size, which makes the phone usable with one hand
  • Overall snappy performance
  • Excellent battery life
The Bad
  • The camera performance leaves a lot to be desired
  • Speakers on the phone are not the loudest
  • Lacks LTE
  • No expandable storage

Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Great battery life
  • Both cameras perform well
The Bad
  • Huge size makes it tough to hold
  • Poor pixel density robs the viewing experience
  • Windows App Store has very few apps
  • 8GB of internal storage may feel less

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB with Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM. When you see Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB Vs Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB stands against Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated October 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page