Compare Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen vs Motorola Moto Turbo

Feature Comparison

  • Motorola Moto Turbo has 3.0% more Screen Size
  • Motorola Moto Turbo has 64GB Internal Storage and Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen has 16GB Internal Storage
  • Motorola Moto Turbo has 3GB RAM, whereas Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen has 1GB RAM
 
Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen
Motorola Moto Turbo
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
47 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
83 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 565 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 805   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 420   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 21MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Slow Motion Video, Burst Mode, Auto HDR, Panorama, Tap to Focus Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.0 Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
141.5 x 70.7 x 10.99 143.5 x 73.3 x 8.3   
Weight
149 grams 176 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Black   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.79GB 53.26GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2070mAh 3900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- Yes   
Fast Charging
- -   

Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen vs Motorola Moto Turbo Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto G 2nd GenMotorola Moto Turbo  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP21MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2070mAh3900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2MP  

Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Improved camera performance over the 1st gen
  • Good battery life
  • Near stock android keeps things snappy
The Bad
  • No 4G LTE connectivity
  • Average front facing speakers

Motorola Moto Turbo Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Quad HD AMOLED Screen with Moto Display feature for quick access to notifications
  • Huge 3900mAh battery
  • Ample 64GB of internal storage
  • Fast charging out of the box
  • Hands-free voice control
The Bad
  • Middling camera quality
  • No fingerprint scanner
  • No TD-LTE (Band 40, 2300MHz) that some Indian 4G networks use

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen with Motorola Moto Turbo. When you see Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen Vs Motorola Moto Turbo comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen stands against Motorola Moto Turbo and which one you should buy. The best price of Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen is currently Rs. 8,999. The lowest price for Motorola Moto Turbo is Rs. 31,999. The prices for both these products were updated July 25, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page