Compare Motorola Moto G4 Play vs Lava X50

Feature Comparison

  • Lava X50 has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Motorola Moto G4 Play has 5 inch Screen Size
  • Motorola Moto G4 Play has 16GB Internal Storage and Lava X50 has 8GB Internal Storage
  • RAM of Motorola Moto G4 Play is the same as Lava X50
 
Motorola Moto G4 Play
Lava X50
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
85 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
80 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6735A   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR Continuous Shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face Detection, White Balance Setting, ISO Setting, Exposure Compensation, Selftimer, Scenemode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 7.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
114 x 72 x 9 155.00 x 71.80 x 8.80   
Weight
137 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Blue   
Build Material
Metal, Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
Yes, 10W Rapid Charger No   

Motorola Moto G4 Play vs Lava X50 Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto G4 PlayLava X50  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Motorola Moto G4 Play Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp and bright display with Gorilla Glass protection
  • Smooth day-to-day performance, thanks to the near Stock Android Marshmallow out of the box
  • 4G LTE support with VoLTE, compatible with Reliance Jio
  • Good battery life with Rapid Charging
  • Water repellant nano coating protects the phone from water spalashes
The Bad
  • Dated processor from last year does not give best of the performance
  • Camera performance is just about average
  • Viewing angles of the display are not that great

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto G4 Play with Lava X50. When you see Motorola Moto G4 Play Vs Lava X50 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto G4 Play stands against Lava X50 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Lava X50 is Rs. 6,199. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page