Compare Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB vs LYF Wind 2

Feature Comparison

  • LYF Wind 2 has 8.0% more Screen Size
  • Both Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB and LYF Wind 2 have same Internal Storage
  • Both Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB and LYF Wind 2 have same RAM
 
Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB
LYF Wind 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
56 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
90 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MediaTek MT6735M   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, Auto-HDR, Pro Mode, Slo-Mo Multi Angle View Mode, ASD, Face Detection, Video Snapshot, Smile Shot and Gesture Capture   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Laser Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android O -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
153 x 76.6 x 9.8 157.5 x 81 x 8.5   
Weight
155 grams 223 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold   
Build Material
Metal, Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.19GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2850mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No -   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
Yes, Turbo Charging -   

Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB vs LYF Wind 2 Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GBLYF Wind 2  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2850mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Brilliant Full HD display at 401PPI
  • Quite good battery life with the 3000mAh unit packed inside with Turbo Charging
  • Quick and accurate fingerprint sensor
  • Excellent primary camera performance with Laser Autofocus
  • Latest Android Marshmallow out of the box with Android N update
The Bad
  • Heating issues while gaming
  • Not a perfect phone for GPS navigation as it lacks Compass sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB with LYF Wind 2. When you see Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB Vs LYF Wind 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB stands against LYF Wind 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Motorola Moto G4 Plus 16GB is currently Rs. 11,249. The lowest price for LYF Wind 2 is Rs. 8,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page