Compare Motorola Moto Turbo vs HTC Desire 820s

Feature Comparison

  • The HTC Desire 820s's got 5.5 inch Screen Size, while Motorola Moto Turbo's Screen Size is 5.2 inch
  • The 64GB Internal Storage on the Motorola Moto Turbo is 75.0% more
  • RAM of Motorola Moto Turbo's is 33.0% more than HTC Desire 820s
 
Motorola Moto Turbo
HTC Desire 820s
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
70 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
83 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
2560 x 1440 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
565 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.7GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 MediaTek MT6752   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 420 Mali-T760 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
21MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Auto Focus, BSI Sensor, Accelerometer Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- Android (4.4)   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
143.5 x 73.3 x 8.3 157.70 x 78.74 x 7.74   
Weight
176 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black White, White-Orange, Milky Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
64GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
53.26GB 12.13GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3900mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
Yes -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Motorola Moto Turbo vs HTC Desire 820s Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto TurboHTC Desire 820s  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 21MP13MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3900mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Motorola Moto Turbo Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Quad HD AMOLED Screen with Moto Display feature for quick access to notifications
  • Huge 3900mAh battery
  • Ample 64GB of internal storage
  • Fast charging out of the box
  • Hands-free voice control
The Bad
  • Middling camera quality
  • No fingerprint scanner
  • No TD-LTE (Band 40, 2300MHz) that some Indian 4G networks use

HTC Desire 820s Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front facing Stereo Speakers
  • 4G LTE connectivity
  • Full HD video recording
The Bad
  • Outdated Android version (4.4 KitKat)
  • Average display sharpness

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto Turbo with HTC Desire 820s. When you see Motorola Moto Turbo Vs HTC Desire 820s comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto Turbo stands against HTC Desire 820s and which one you should buy. The best price of Motorola Moto Turbo is currently Rs. 31,999. The lowest price for HTC Desire 820s is Rs. 16,199. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page