Compare Motorola Moto X Force vs HTC Desire 830

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 830 has 1.0% more Screen Size
  • Both Motorola Moto X Force and HTC Desire 830 have same Internal Storage
  • Both Motorola Moto X Force and HTC Desire 830 have same RAM
 
Motorola Moto X Force
HTC Desire 830
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
57 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
92 Value For Money Score
71 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
2560 x 1440 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED -   
Pixel Density
544 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
ShatterShield -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 430 Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
21MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 4MP   
Camera Details
4x Digital Zoom, Burst mode, Night mode, Auto HDR, Panorama, Drag to Focus and Exposure, Video Stabilization Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 7.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
149.80 x 78.00 x 9.20 157.5 x 78.9 x 7.8   
Weight
168 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Ballistic Nylon, Grey, White White Blue, White Red, Black Gold   
Build Material
Metal, Kevlar Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
4 Years screen replacement warranty -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
22GB -   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
2TB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3760mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
Yes, -   
Fast Charging
Yes, Turbo Charging -   

Motorola Moto X Force vs HTC Desire 830 Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto X ForceHTC Desire 830  
Screen Size 5.4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 21MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3760mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP4MP  

Motorola Moto X Force Pros & Cons

The Good
  • ShatterShield display from Motorola is nearly impossible to break
  • Very crisp Quad HD display with 544PPI
  • Battery life hold up very well with Turbo Charging from Motorola
  • Top notch performance with an excellent processor and 3GB RAM
  • Clean and vanilla Android UI adds up to the buttery smooth overall experience
The Bad
  • No fingerprint scanner is a huge disappointment
  • Lacks LED notification light
  • Bulky build makes it feel huge in hands

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto X Force with HTC Desire 830. When you see Motorola Moto X Force Vs HTC Desire 830 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto X Force stands against HTC Desire 830 and which one you should buy. The best price of Motorola Moto X Force is currently Rs. 19,990. The lowest price for HTC Desire 830 is Rs. 15,300. The prices for both these products were updated August 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page