Compare Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen vs HTC One E9+

Feature Comparison

  • HTC One E9+ has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen has 5.2 inch Screen Size
  • HTC One E9+ has 32GB Internal Storage and Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen has 16GB Internal Storage
  • HTC One E9+'s got 33.0% more RAM
 
Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen
HTC One E9+
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
86 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
80 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
424 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.5GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 20MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 4MP   
Camera Details
1/3" Sensor Size, 1.13 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-Tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- Sense UI   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
140.8 x 72.4 x 9.97 156.5 x 76.5 x 7.54   
Weight
144 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Cognac Leather, Royal Blue, White, White Turquoise, White Bamboo, Black Leather Meteor Grey, Rose Gold   
Build Material
Metal, Polycarbonate -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 22GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen vs HTC One E9+ Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto X 2nd GenHTC One E9+  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP20MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP4MP  

Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unique, useful software features
  • Solid acoustic experience from earpiece to speakerphone
  • Excellent build quality, feels good to hold
  • Very sharp Full HD AMOLED display with great color reproduction
The Bad
  • No MicroSD slot
  • Average battery backup

HTC One E9+ Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Mindboggling display quality at 534PPI with Gorilla Glass 4 protection
  • HTC BoomSound Stereo speakers
  • Metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Decent performance and battery life
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • No fast charging support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen with HTC One E9+. When you see Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen Vs HTC One E9+ comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen stands against HTC One E9+ and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page