Compare Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen vs Vivo Y55S

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen is the same as Vivo Y55S
  • Internal Storage of Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen is the same as Vivo Y55S
  • Vivo Y55S has 33.0% more RAM
 
Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen
Vivo Y55S
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
81 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
80 Value For Money Score
71 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
424 PPI 282 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.5GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
1/3" Sensor Size, 1.13 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR f/2.0 Aperture, Auto Focus, Contious Focus, Digital Zoom, Geo tagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch Focus, Face Detection, White Balance, ISO Setting, Exposure Compensation, Self Timer, Scene Mode, Screen Flash   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- Funtouch OS 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
140.8 x 72.4 x 9.97 147.9 x 72.9 x 7.5   
Weight
144 grams 142 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Cognac Leather, Royal Blue, White, White Turquoise, White Bamboo, Black Leather Gold, Space Gray   
Build Material
Metal, Polycarbonate Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 12GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2730mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen vs Vivo Y55S Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto X 2nd GenVivo Y55S  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2730mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unique, useful software features
  • Solid acoustic experience from earpiece to speakerphone
  • Excellent build quality, feels good to hold
  • Very sharp Full HD AMOLED display with great color reproduction
The Bad
  • No MicroSD slot
  • Average battery backup

Vivo Y55S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sleek & light weight design
  • Decent battery life
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
The Bad
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • Poor cameras
  • Average performance for the price

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen with Vivo Y55S. When you see Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen Vs Vivo Y55S comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen stands against Vivo Y55S and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Vivo Y55S is Rs. 10,880. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page