Compare Motorola Moto X Play vs Brandsdaddy Magic Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Motorola Moto X Play has 5.5 inch Screen Size, whereas Brandsdaddy Magic Plus has 5 inch Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Motorola Moto X Play is the same as Brandsdaddy Magic Plus
  • Both Motorola Moto X Play and Brandsdaddy Magic Plus have same RAM
 
Motorola Moto X Play
Brandsdaddy Magic Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
71 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
79 Value For Money Score
64 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
21MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
f/2.0, Phase Detection Autofocus, Dual-LED (Dual Tone) Flash, Check Quality Features 1/2.4" Sensor Size, 1.1 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, Auto-HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 7.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
148.0 x 75.0 x 8.9 140.6 x 72.1 x 9.15   
Weight
169 grams 158.6 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Black   
Build Material
Polycarbonate -   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3630mAh 3500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No -   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
Yes, Turbo Charging -   

Motorola Moto X Play vs Brandsdaddy Magic Plus Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto X PlayBrandsdaddy Magic Plus  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 21MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3630mAh3500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Motorola Moto X Play Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Close to stock Android ensures timely updates
  • Very good battery life
  • The curve on the back ensures that phone sits very nicely in the hand
  • Bright and punchy display with excellent color reproduction
  • Dual SIM card slot and a separate slot for MicroSD
The Bad
  • Camera performance can be underwhelming especially in low light
  • No water or dust resistance
  • The phone can get a little warm during day to day usage
  • The speaker grille flushed almost with the body means dust removal can be a bit of pain

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto X Play with Brandsdaddy Magic Plus. When you see Motorola Moto X Play Vs Brandsdaddy Magic Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto X Play stands against Brandsdaddy Magic Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Motorola Moto X Play is currently Rs. 14,990. The lowest price for Brandsdaddy Magic Plus is Rs. 16,199. The prices for both these products were updated October 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page