Compare Motorola Moto X Play vs Honor 8 Lite

Feature Comparison

  • Motorola Moto X Play has 5.0% more Screen Size
  • The 64GB Internal Storage on the Honor 8 Lite is 75.0% more
  • The 4GB RAM on the Honor 8 Lite is 50.0% more
 
Motorola Moto X Play
Honor 8 Lite
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
90 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
79 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm HiSilicon Kirin   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 HiSilicon Kirin 655   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T830   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
21MP 12MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Camera Details
f/2.0, Phase Detection Autofocus, Dual-LED (Dual Tone) Flash, Check Quality Features 1/2.4" Sensor Size, 1.1 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, Auto-HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- EMUI 5.0   
OS Upgradable To
Android 7.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
148.0 x 75.0 x 8.9 147.20 x 72.94 x 7.60   
Weight
169 grams 147 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Blue, Gold, Black, White   
Build Material
Polycarbonate -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3630mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
Yes, Turbo Charging -   

Motorola Moto X Play vs Honor 8 Lite Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto X PlayHonor 8 Lite  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 21MP12MP  
RAM 2GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 3630mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Motorola Moto X Play Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Close to stock Android ensures timely updates
  • Very good battery life
  • The curve on the back ensures that phone sits very nicely in the hand
  • Bright and punchy display with excellent color reproduction
  • Dual SIM card slot and a separate slot for MicroSD
The Bad
  • Camera performance can be underwhelming especially in low light
  • No water or dust resistance
  • The phone can get a little warm during day to day usage
  • The speaker grille flushed almost with the body means dust removal can be a bit of pain

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto X Play with Honor 8 Lite. When you see Motorola Moto X Play Vs Honor 8 Lite comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto X Play stands against Honor 8 Lite and which one you should buy. The best price of Motorola Moto X Play is currently Rs. 15,990. The lowest price for Honor 8 Lite is Rs. 14,200. The prices for both these products were updated August 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page