Compare Motorola Moto Z Play vs Vivo V7 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Vivo V7 Plus's Screen Size is 8.0% more
  • Vivo V7 Plus's 64GB Internal Storage is more than Motorola Moto Z Play's 32GB Internal Storage
  • The RAM on Vivo V7 Plus is 25.0% more
 
We Love
Motorola Moto Z Play
Vivo V7 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
72 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
95 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.99 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1440 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 269 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 506 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 24MP   
Camera Details
1.3 µm pixel size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Laser Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 7.1 Nougat   
OS Detail
- Funtouch OS 3.2   
OS Upgradable To
Android O -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
USB Type C Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156.4 x 76.4 x 6.99 155.87 x 75.74 x 7.7   
Weight
165 grams 160 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Champagne Gold, Matte Black   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on Handset & 6 Months on Accessories   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
2TB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3510mAh 3225mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
Yes, TurboPower No   

Motorola Moto Z Play vs Vivo V7 Plus Specs

Specs
Motorola Moto Z PlayVivo V7 Plus  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.99 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP16MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 3510mAh3225mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP24MP  

Motorola Moto Z Play Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality, phone feels good to hold
  • Rear camera captures detailed images
  • Excellent battery life to easily last through the day
  • Supports all existing Moto Mods
  • Bloat free stock Android experience makes the device run flawlessly
The Bad
  • Low light shots with the rear camera don't turn out to be great
  • Lacks Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Processor not being the most powerful may disappoint gamers

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Motorola Moto Z Play with Vivo V7 Plus. When you see Motorola Moto Z Play Vs Vivo V7 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Motorola Moto Z Play stands against Vivo V7 Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Motorola Moto Z Play is currently Rs. 22,499. The lowest price for Vivo V7 Plus is Rs. 19,599. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page