Compare Nokia 101 vs Nokia 109

Feature Comparison

  • Both Nokia 101 and Nokia 109 have same Screen Size
  • Nokia 109 has 50.0% more Internal Storage
 
Nokia 101
Nokia 109
 
 
-- Value For Money Score
-- Value For Money Score
   
Display        
Screen Size
1.8 inch 1.8 inch    
Screen Resolution
160 x 128 pixels 160 x 128 pixels    
Screen Type
LCD LCD    
Pixel Density
113.8 PPI 113.8 PPI    
Screen Protection
- -    
Chipset        
Brand
- -    
Processor Speed
- -    
Processor
- -    
Processor Type
- -    
RAM
- -    
Graphics
- -    
Camera        
Rear Camera Resolution
- -    
Front Camera Resolution
- -    
Camera Details
- -    
Video Recording Resolution
- -    
Camera Features
- -    
General Specifications        
Operating System
Proprietary Proprietary    
OS Version
- -    
OS Detail
Proprietary Proprietary    
OS Upgradable To
- -    
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Non-Touchscreen    
USB Connector Type
- -    
Features
FM Radio -    
Dimensions (mm)
110 x 45.5 x 14.9 110 x 46 x 14.8    
Weight
71 grams 77 grams    
Connectivity
- 2G    
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm    
Color
- Cyan, Black    
Build Material
- -    
Storage        
Internal Storage
8MB 16MB    
Card Slot
Yes Yes    
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
16GB 32GB    
User Available Storage
- -    
Communication        
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single    
Network Type
GSM GSM    
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM    
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -    
Battery        
Battery Capacity
1020mAh 800mAh    
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)    
Removable Battery
Yes Yes    
Wireless Charging
- -    
Fast Charging
- -    

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia 101 with Nokia 109. When you see Nokia 101 Vs Nokia 109 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia 101 stands against Nokia 109 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 27, 2016.
 
Report an error on this page