Compare Nokia Lumia 520 vs Vivo V3

Feature Comparison

  • The Vivo V3's got 5 inch Screen Size, while Nokia Lumia 520's Screen Size is 4 inch
  • Vivo V3's 32GB Internal Storage is more than Nokia Lumia 520's 8GB Internal Storage
  • The 3GB RAM on the Vivo V3 is 83.0% more
 
Nokia Lumia 520
Vivo V3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
10 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
44 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233.2 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 616   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
1/4'' Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging. Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8 Funtouch OS 2.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
119.9 x 64 x 9.9 143.6 x 71 x 7.5   
Weight
124 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Yellow, White, Red Gold, Rose Gold   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 23.51GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1430mAh 2550mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Nokia Lumia 520 vs Vivo V3 Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 520Vivo V3  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1430mAh2550mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP  

Vivo V3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • 5 inch handy form factor with sharp display
  • Decent battery life and overall performance
  • Ample 32GB onboard storage with dedicated MicroSD card slot
  • Fast and accurate fingerprint scanner
The Bad
  • Runs on outdated Android 5.1 Lollipop with no update schedule
  • Average rear camera output

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 520 with Vivo V3. When you see Nokia Lumia 520 Vs Vivo V3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 520 stands against Vivo V3 and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia Lumia 520 is currently Rs. 8,000. The lowest price for Vivo V3 is Rs. 15,500. The prices for both these products were updated November 19, 2017.
Report an error on this page