Compare Nokia Lumia 525 vs HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim

Feature Comparison

  • The HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim's got 5.5 inch Screen Size, while Nokia Lumia 525's Screen Size is 4 inch
  • The HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim has 16GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • The RAM on HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim is 50.0% more
 
Nokia Lumia 525
HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
25 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
72 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233.2 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 836 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
- 4MP   
Camera Details
1/4'' Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama, OIS, BSI Sensor   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
119.9 x 64 x 9.9 157.7 × 78.9 × 7.9   
Weight
124 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White, Yellow White, Dark Grey   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 9.14GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1430mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Nokia Lumia 525 vs HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 525HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1430mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 4MP  

HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Rear camera has Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Crisp Full HD display with a pixel density of 401 PPI
  • Decent battery life
  • Smooth User Interface by HTC
The Bad
  • Lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • No fast charging support
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor

Nokia Lumia 525 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The curved back makes the phone sit in the palm very comfortably
  • Metro UI is really well optimized and feels very fluid
  • Back panels on the phone can be interchanged
  • Dedicated camera button is really useful
The Bad
  • Lacks flash light on the back
  • No front facing camera
  • Poor outdoor visibility on the screen
  • Windows Phone ecosystem has very limited applications

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 525 with HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim. When you see Nokia Lumia 525 Vs HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 525 stands against HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia Lumia 525 is currently Rs. 11,499. The lowest price for HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim is Rs. 9,700. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page