Compare Nokia Lumia 525 vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G

Feature Comparison

  • Intex Aqua Ace 4G's 5 inch Screen Size is more than Nokia Lumia 525's 4 inch Screen Size
  • The Intex Aqua Ace 4G's Internal Storage measures in at 16GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • Intex Aqua Ace 4G has 3GB RAM, whereas Nokia Lumia 525 has 1GB RAM
 
Nokia Lumia 525
Intex Aqua Ace 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
25 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
71 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
233.2 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 836 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Camera Details
1/4'' Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging Add Face Detection, Gesture Capture, Take Photo While Recording, Voice Capture,Panorama, Mira Vision   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
119.9 x 64 x 9.9 145 x 71.5 x 6.7   
Weight
124 grams 122 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White, Yellow White, Black   
Build Material
- Glass, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.01GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1430mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Nokia Lumia 525 vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 525Intex Aqua Ace 4G  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1430mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Nokia Lumia 525 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The curved back makes the phone sit in the palm very comfortably
  • Metro UI is really well optimized and feels very fluid
  • Back panels on the phone can be interchanged
  • Dedicated camera button is really useful
The Bad
  • Lacks flash light on the back
  • No front facing camera
  • Poor outdoor visibility on the screen
  • Windows Phone ecosystem has very limited applications

Intex Aqua Ace 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Ample 3GB of RAM for excellent multitasking experience
  • Support 4G LTE network in India
The Bad
  • Average battery life
  • Not that great processor performance
  • Android Lollipop is a slight disappointment in Marshmallow era

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 525 with Intex Aqua Ace 4G. When you see Nokia Lumia 525 Vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 525 stands against Intex Aqua Ace 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia Lumia 525 is currently Rs. 11,499. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Ace 4G is Rs. 7,499. The prices for both these products were updated August 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page