Compare Nokia Lumia 525 vs Xolo Era 2X

Feature Comparison

  • The 5 inch Screen Size on the Xolo Era 2X is 20.0% more
  • The Xolo Era 2X has 16GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • Xolo Era 2X has 2GB RAM, whereas Nokia Lumia 525 has 1GB RAM
 
Nokia Lumia 525
Xolo Era 2X
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
27 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233.2 PPI 297 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 836 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Camera Details
1/4'' Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging Auto Focus Rear Camera with 5P Largan Lens, F2.0, Blue Glass Filter, Face Beauty, HDR, Panorama, Gesture Recognition, Voice Capture, Smile Shot, Face Detection, Self Timer, Time Lapse Video   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
119.9 x 64 x 9.9 144 x x72.3 x 9.5   
Weight
124 grams -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White, Yellow Black and Gun, Latte Gold   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1430mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Nokia Lumia 525 vs Xolo Era 2X Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 525Xolo Era 2X  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1430mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Nokia Lumia 525 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The curved back makes the phone sit in the palm very comfortably
  • Metro UI is really well optimized and feels very fluid
  • Back panels on the phone can be interchanged
  • Dedicated camera button is really useful
The Bad
  • Lacks flash light on the back
  • No front facing camera
  • Poor outdoor visibility on the screen
  • Windows Phone ecosystem has very limited applications

Xolo Era 2X Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Useful fingerprint sensor embedded gestures
  • Decent overall performance
  • Reliance Jio (VoLTE) supported
The Bad
  • Big footprint despite a 5-inch display
  • Average display quality
  • Median camera output
  • Poor battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 525 with Xolo Era 2X. When you see Nokia Lumia 525 Vs Xolo Era 2X comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 525 stands against Xolo Era 2X and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia Lumia 525 is currently Rs. 11,499. The lowest price for Xolo Era 2X is Rs. 5,899. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page