Compare Nokia Lumia 625 vs Sony Xperia Z1 Compact D5503

Feature Comparison

  • Nokia Lumia 625's 4.7 inch Screen Size is more than Sony Xperia Z1 Compact D5503's 4.3 inch Screen Size
  • The Sony Xperia Z1 Compact D5503's got 16GB Internal Storage, while Nokia Lumia 625's Internal Storage is 8GB
  • Sony Xperia Z1 Compact D5503 has 2GB RAM and Nokia Lumia 625 has 512MB RAM
 
Nokia Lumia 625
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact D5503
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
41 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
95 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 4.3 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
198.5 PPI 342 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 330   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 20.7MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus 1/2.3'' Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, Image Stabilization, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8 Android (4.3)   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.1   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Water Resistance, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
133.3 x 72.3 x 9.2 127 x 64.9 x 9.5   
Weight
159 grams 137 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Orange, White Black, Pink, White, Yellow   
Build Material
- Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 64GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Nokia Lumia 625 vs Sony Xperia Z1 Compact D5503 Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 625Sony Xperia Z1 Compact D5503  
Screen Size 4.7 inch4.3 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP20.7MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP2MP  

Nokia Lumia 625 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Supports LTE
  • Good battery life
  • Attractive phone as it is available in plenty of colour options
The Bad
  • The rear camera has a substantial shutter lag
  • Lack of magnetometer results in no compass
  • Low resolution poor display

Sony Xperia Z1 Compact D5503 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Premium build quality that feels very solid in hand
  • Excellent size, literally perfect for one handed usage
  • Very capable camera
  • Display is a major improvement over some of Sony's flagships
The Bad
  • Runs aged Android version
  • Several duplicate applications exist out of the box which equates to bloatware
  • Glass back of the phone picks up scratches easily
  • FOr anyone with medium sized hands, the physical shutter button would feel too small

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 625 with Sony Xperia Z1 Compact D5503. When you see Nokia Lumia 625 Vs Sony Xperia Z1 Compact D5503 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 625 stands against Sony Xperia Z1 Compact D5503 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page